You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on Reality Hipcheck within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. For those who have kids in CA schools, this is a must read:
California school districts ending or reducing bus service for students - Los Angeles Times
this is not
Why doesn't California mandate buses anyway? They should mandate rides for every student outside of a mile from school. All they're doing is passing the costs on to everyone else. More parents, as a result, are going to buy cars for their teenage kids that happen to be junkers both unsafe and pollutant on top of the other problems listed in the article. And more teens having more cars mean they would be more apt to drive places other than just school.
All of this would raise gas prices and insurance rates due to more drivers being on the road and presumably and likely more accidents.But at least the school district gets to save a buck yet the citizens will be paying the same anyway if not more.
Why doesn't California mandate buses anyway? They should mandate rides for every student outside of a mile from school. All they're doing is passing the costs on to everyone else. More parents, as a result, are going to buy cars for their teenage kids that happen to be junkers both unsafe and pollutant on top of the other problems listed in the article. And more teens having more cars mean they would be more apt to drive places other than just school.
All of this would raise gas prices and insurance rates due to more drivers being on the road and presumably and likely more accidents.But at least the school district gets to save a buck yet the citizens will be paying the same anyway if not more.
It'd be a lot cheaper, and a lot safer, if parents just bought them a bus pass instead. Same idea, different bus, that's all.
__________________ "My daughter asked me what I wanted to be for Halloween, and I said I might as well dress up as Johnny Damon, since he scared the hell out of me."
- Yankees Manager Joe Torre
Used the bus from K-4, the school was 2/3rds of a mile from our house, but we were the 2nd to last stop on the way back (leave school at 2:15, arrive at our house around 2:55). Took 20 minutes walking and not being stuck in a big iron lung without A/C.
Why doesn't California mandate buses anyway? They should mandate rides for every student outside of a mile from school. All they're doing is passing the costs on to everyone else. More parents, as a result, are going to buy cars for their teenage kids that happen to be junkers both unsafe and pollutant on top of the other problems listed in the article. And more teens having more cars mean they would be more apt to drive places other than just school.
All of this would raise gas prices and insurance rates due to more drivers being on the road and presumably and likely more accidents.But at least the school district gets to save a buck yet the citizens will be paying the same anyway if not more.
The problem is that if schools don't pass the costs on, they're going to have to cut funding from other areas to pay for the higher transportation costs. Would you rather have a school bus come pick up your kids at the corner or would you rather have to drive your child to school where he or she will continue to have access to things like a fully-staffed library or computer lab, music program, and art program?
California is near the bottom in things like funding per pupil and schools do not have enough librarians and guidance counselors for students and I haven't even mentioned overcrowded classrooms. School funding is a mess. Unfortunately, a lot of school funding is considered categorical and cannot be shifted to other areas. If you get money for special ed students, you cannot take it to pay for school buses for kids, etc.
Most schools don't have a nurse on site everyday anymore either. With that many people in any given location someone is going to be getting hurt or become sick daily. It's an unsafe situation because of lack of funds.
Yet we can still pay actors $20 million for a movie or athletes that much to play a game. I know it entertainment and all but we've got it a bit backwards here in America and we'll be paying the price for generations.
__________________ Waiting for the one, The day that never comes,
When you stand up and feel the warmth but the sunshine never comes, no
No, the sunshine never comes
2008... after this life will never, EVER, be the same again.
Why doesn't California mandate buses anyway? They should mandate rides for every student outside of a mile from school. All they're doing is passing the costs on to everyone else. More parents, as a result, are going to buy cars for their teenage kids that happen to be junkers both unsafe and pollutant on top of the other problems listed in the article. And more teens having more cars mean they would be more apt to drive places other than just school.
All of this would raise gas prices and insurance rates due to more drivers being on the road and presumably and likely more accidents.But at least the school district gets to save a buck yet the citizens will be paying the same anyway if not more.
Bussing all of the students who live ore than a mile away is kind of a dumb idea. Like the others have said let the kids ride a bike etc. If they live outside of 2 miles, ...well that may be a different story, but a mile is ridiculous
coming from someone whose only time on the bus was during the kindergarten and 1st grade years, and has slight recollections of those rides at all, I wish I could provide a more realistic opinion on this matter.
other than those two years, I've biked, walked, and carpooled to schools everyday, but only because the bus service was not an available option for me, which did not help the sanity of my parents for the sake of my safety. given that, I would be sitting on the fence on two things:
- walking and biking mean more exercises and better self-control and independence whereas the bus does not do so, although the risk of injuries from getting hit by a car, running into a storm drain or falling off onto the curb, etc., greatly increases.
- riding the carpool and bus provide more security, although problems do arise such as unchecked bullying, fighting, mischievous manners, etc., that occur in the buses on a daily basis across America. nevermind that many of the buses are not equipped with seatbelts.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lars1970 on Thursday, October 2, 2008: