You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on NHL Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. I'd read this whole thread start to finish but I'm far too busy being delicious.
This is the only kind of legal advice I need.
YouTube - Judge fudge
tier one is nothing to sneeze at. how'd you do on the lsat?
My lsat score was 160. It was my GPA and personal statement that helped me get in where i am going. In my opinion the lsat is bull. It is no indicator of how you will do in law school.
As would I. I'm curious, well, nosy, so....Come on, don't be shy. Give it up dude.
I explained above why I wont give it. Im not stupid to give out information that will reveal my identity. I dont want my reputation in law to be tarnished simply because a few lawyers on this message board found me "without integrity".
Sidenote: I'm no young lawyer who whoops up on seasoned counterparts for sport, however, all I could think of when you published such comments as...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry H. Arsenic
As far as integrity, I dont see internet conversations has anything real, this is just bull **** for fun. If I was speaking to you in person and actually knew you, than it would be a different story. Fo all you know, I could be saying the exact opposite of what you are saying just for the hell of it. Why are you assuming I actually believe in what i am saying? Your the dumbass for continuing to argue with me despite being already frustrated and supposedly knowing better.
was that integrity comes in all forms. I for one don't use 'teh 1n73rw3bz' as an excuse for being a douche. Most of the people here dont. That's like admitting that you would rather hide behind a fake personality on the internet than be yourself. Every word Ive typed for the last 5 years (God, Im a g33k...) I would stand behind and repeat to your face in person... and have done so on more than one occasion.
But hey, maybe I just have more e-tegrity than you.
I dont blame you for not wanting to give out your personal information, however you saying you're some hot **** law student means nothing if have no balls to stand face to face with someone and say the same things you type. Moreover, tossing out random accomplishments on teh internet is a waste of time because all anyone will ever do is think you're fake. Every post in this thread you create thinking you're one-upping someone or pissin them off is pointless since everyone is really laughing. hmm come to think of it, Ive been seriously entertained so maybe there is a point to it.
someone got the gavel??
__________________
One day, I will have the technology.
Last edited by Unruely35; January 25th, 2008 at 07:38 PM.
I plan on doing military law for my first 4 years (JAG). After I finsih that I want to do international law, mostly contract related work. I would rather not say where i go to school because i want to keep my name anonmous. But its a tier 1 school.
tier 1, huh?
it's loyola, isn't it?
__________________ here i'm allowed
everything all of the time.
Sidenote: I'm no young lawyer who whoops up on seasoned counterparts for sport, however, all I could think of when you published such comments as...
was that integrity comes in all forms. I for one don't use 'teh 1n73rw3bz' as an excuse for being a douche. Most of the people here dont. That's like admitting that you would rather hide behind a fake personality on the internet than be yourself. Every word Ive typed for the last 5 years (God, Im a g33k...) I would stand behind and repeat to your face in person... and have done so on more than one occasion.
But hey, maybe I just have more e-tegrity than you.
I dont blame you for not wanting to give out your personal information, however you saying you're some hot **** law student means nothing if have no balls to stand face to face with someone and say the same things you type. Moreover, tossing out random accomplishments on teh internet is a waste of time because all anyone will ever do is think you're fake. Every post in this thread you create thinking you're one-upping someone or pissin them off is pointless since everyone is really laughing. hmm come to think of it, Ive been seriously entertained so maybe there is a point to it.
someone got the gavel??
Everyone has their own take on the internet and these message boards. If you have spent the last 5 years actually writing solid thoughts that you would stand behind that is your business. Personally i find this message board as a joke and something to mess around on. Dont actors make up identiities to amuse others and for entertainment? So according to your logic they have no integrity because they dont speak whats on their mind 24/7. Personally being on this board I think of it as acting. I create a character and have fun.
As far as "everyone really laughing" I havent seen a single post on this thread with a happy face and a hundred lols. All i have seen is distinguished members of our community, i.e. a judge and senior attorney, wasting their precious time stooping down to my character's level and actually typing comments as to how outraged they are and how they think i am this and that. If people were actually laughing at my comments and didnt take them seriously (which they shouldn't) they would stop responding to my comments. You yourself wasted two to ten minutes of your time thinking up of a smart comment to try to get back at my "character" when you yourself think that i am a young punk with no integrity messing around on this board.
And something to most of the posters on this thread and especially you. Why do people type a response that doesnt really make a strong counterargument and attacks the person who wrote the comment? If you want to prove me wrong on something speak to what i am saying not who I am.
If you want to prove me wrong on something speak to what i am saying not who I am.
i wasn't going to get into this any further, but since you brought me into it to insult me again, here it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arsenic33
As a 2nd year law student I have argued entire appellate court cases by my self against real lawyers in a 9th Circuit court and smoked them.
you're lying. you couldn't argue in the ninth circuit by yourself. take a look at rule (C) here.
"(C) In order to be admitted to the bar of this court, an attorney must have been previously admitted to practice (and be in good standing) before either (1) the Supreme Court of the United States, or (2) another United States Court of Appeals, or (3) any United States District Court, or (4) the highest state appellate court of one of the states of the United States."
the only way you could have smoked them is face down in their laps.
you are inarticulate. you can't spell, punctuate or make a grammatically correct sentence. your legal "arguments" are full of jargon and technical terms that are misused. your legal "theories" are not merely wrong, they are preposterously stupid.
i've pretty much been slapping you around, making you look foolish with every new half-witted response you come up with. just for fun. and you're not smart enough to realize i'm doing it. i'm not "outraged" by you. frankly, i wouldn't care enough to piss in your mouth if your stomach were on fire.
if you're in law school, it ain't top tier. they have standards. i know, because i went to one. if you can't write any better than that, can't articulate a clear thought, or spell or punctuate, you did not get into law school on the merits of your personal statement.
if you don't know why a "non-compete" clause is irrelevant to the quinn case, or that "substantial performance" is not an issue in the malvey case, or even that slander is not a cause of action but defamation is (think you can tell me why, counselor?), i seriously doubt you made it to the second year at a top tier law school.
and i know the military is desperate for bodies right now, but i find it hard to believe they're desperate enough to let a complete nimrod into jag corps.
people have been laughing at you for three days now. you have no credibility. and pretty much anybody who's looked at this thread knows you're a whiny little bitch who's not only dumb, but too dumb to realize just how dumb he is.
and, by the way, misrepresenting your legal experience is the type of thing that raises questions on your moral character application. so if you are actually in law school and plan on becoming an attorney, you should probably stop lying about it.
so, now that you've been proven to be full of ****, would you please just shut up? it's just pathetic.
__________________ I'm the King of Rock & Roll. If you don't like it, you can lump it.
Last edited by 4/10/82; January 26th, 2008 at 01:37 AM.
Thats CRAZY!!! 4/10/82, I had a little more hope for the guy, but he did EXACTLY what you said he would. That's awesome...
Hey Lunchie!!! Ive got some stuff to show you, this 4/10/82 is like a frickin Nostradamus!!! *call me*
Oh and Arsenic, honey : Actors get paid more and get artistic satisfaction out of the characters they portray. All you got was 6 people in chatroom and private message being entertained. This character surely thinks more of himself than anyone else does. Don't worry, no one has taken you seriously enough to respond in any way other than being thoroughly entertained. Just because the little arent there, doesnt mean we havent been LMAeault* at you. Seriously, this thread has been a riot. Trying to use our response time as to how ridiculous we are as o