You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on NHL Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. Originally Posted by OrangePuck
I love how all of you guys share the same joke. Lately it's been oh..OP posts on a a teams board that is not his own.
I love how all of you guys share the same joke. Lately it's been oh..OP posts on a a teams board that is not his own. All of a sudden the copycats come out of the woodwork. The fact remains, the Kings didn't beat the Duck. Dallas beat the Duck. Quit trying to take credit for what another fan base has dibs on.
You people make what I do far too easy.
Just because the guy that writes your material is on a different board doesn't make you any less of a "copycat".
Incidentally... kudos on the second grade "sick burn".
Read it again. It wasn't meant as a joke. I don't care if you post here or not. I'm talking about posting on another team's message board DURING A PLAYOFF GAME where your team is on the brink of elimination.
Whenever the Kings make the playoffs again, I won't care to be anywhere near LGK, let alone another team's board.
Dude, the game was in Dallas. If your response is that I should have been on a Ducks board then I'll disagree. I'm not into circle jerk parties. I'd rather be mixing it up. It's more fun.
Not only that, there are a large number of LGKers who take breaks from this site because they can't stand a large number of their fellow King fans. If you keep that it mind it should not be so difficult to understand why I avoid other Duck sites altogether.
The best part is I won $50 from my Ducks-fan brother-in-law. I actually wouldn't have minded the quacks winning if only to improve the Kings' draft selection, but I had a feeling they'd lose this.
Selanne and Niedermayer's decision to sit out so long bothered me from the get-go, not personally, but from a strategic perspective. It reeked of entitlement at best, and serious pussification at worst--it messed with team chemistry and I think it gave other teams' even extra motivation to want to beat Anaheim. I think it also rattled the Ducks' confidence, particularly in the offensive end. It also screwed the Ducks out of Andy MacDonald, who was pretty heroic last year for them, IIRC. Combine all that with a shaky offense all season as well as the recent history of defending cup Champions, and I had a feeling.
The check's in the mail, I've been told. How sweet it is.
Just because the guy that writes your material is on a different board doesn't make you any less of a "copycat".
Incidentally... kudos on the second grade "sick burn".
Another lame and borrowed tactic. I never claimed to make up "The Duck" and didn't know that you know who coined the phrase. It just sounds funny to me so I use it.
As for material, don't pat yourself on the back too much (oh, I'm sorry DHKF used that earlier) you talk out of both sides of your mouth and post landmines that the unwitting fall for. Don't hate me just because I figured it out and called you on it.
Dude, the game was in Dallas. If your response is that I should have been on a Ducks board then I'll disagree. I'm not into circle jerk parties. I'd rather be mixing it up. It's more fun.
Not only that, there are a large number of LGKers who take breaks from this site because they can't stand a large number of their fellow King fans. If you keep that it mind it should not be so difficult to understand why I avoid other Duck sites altogether.
It's about being on any site. Ducks, Kings, whatever. Enjoy the ****ing game. If you want to post here, that's fine. Nothing that you have said regarding hockey ever since the ducks won the cup has been remotely original, so lets relax with the "you people make what I do far too easy" because you don't "do" anything here.
__________________ your: your book | you're: you are ||| its: possessive! | it's: it is
their: their book | they're: they are | there: over there
to: going to the store | too: too much | two: 2!
lose: opposite of win | loose: your mom
Another lame and borrowed tactic. I never claimed to make up "The Duck" and didn't know that you know who coined the phrase. It just sounds funny to me so I use it.
I can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse to change the topic or that you truly don't get it sometimes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangePuck
As for material, don't pat yourself on the back too much (oh, I'm sorry DHKF used that earlier) you talk out of both sides of your mouth and post landmines that the unwitting fall for
By all means tell me how I talk out of both sides of my mouth? My god do you ever actually address things or do you just backpedal all the time? No wonder you think you 're winning all the time.
By all means tell me how I talk out of both sides of my mouth? My god do you ever actually address things or do you just backpedal all the time? No wonder you think you 're winning all the time.
That's just his tactic. If he can't think of anything to say in response he just switches gears and attacks the person he's arguing with. It's called ad hominem.
That's just his tactic. If he can't think of anything to say in response he just switches gears and attacks the person he's arguing with. It's called ad hominem.
By all means tell me how I talk out of both sides of my mouth? My god do you ever actually address things or do you just backpedal all the time? No wonder you think you 're winning all the time.
Dude you're so full of ****. I addressed it last week when it happened and even quoted the post. Your typically pretentions response was "It's easy to understand if you aren't an idiot." As for being deliberately obtuse, pot meet kettle. Your "if you aren't an idiot" response was the same ad hominem attack that you love to accuse me of on a regular basis. You avoided addressing this back then and now a week later you want me to go fish out that thread? **** you. Look it up yourself if it's that important you lazy ass.
Screw you and your hypocritical self righteous double edged bull****. You impress a large number of people on this board so don't get too butthurt because I don't fall for it like every one else has.
Dr. Naysay
