Want less ads?
Join Team LGK
for only $5

Official LA Kings Shop

LA Kings Hats icon
Men's Apparel icon
Women's Apparel icon
Kid's Wear icon
Collectibles and Memorabilia icon
Home / Office icon
Toys and Games icon
DVD's and CD's icon
Kings Gifts icon
Kings Auctions
Hockey Books
Entertainment Books
iPod Connection
LGK T-Shirts
NHL Personal Checks

Tag Cloud
2008 acquire avery back big birthday blake blues call cammalleri coach conference coyotes crawford cup day deal dean derby dolls doughty draft ducks entry final flames free game go kings happy head hockey inside interview july kings lgk lombardi lubo make mccain news nhl obama penguins pick picks rangers rip rob round season sharks sign signs stamkos stanley stuart team teubert thread times today top trade video visnovsky wings year years
Rinkrat's iPod  



Go Back   Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum > LetsGoKings.com > LA Kings Talk
Reload this Page Who had the better roster?
Register GalleryBlogs FAQ Calendar Arcade Wagering

Notices
Welcome to the LetsGoKings.com forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!

About This Page: This is a discussion on LA Kings Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum.
In the post salary cap era it isn't exactly apples to apples. Who has the most talent players isn't rally a fair way to asses the teams. . It'

Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 29th, 2008, 02:06 PM   #19
Burta Burta Burt
 
bubbaganoush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,349
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Crosschecks: 3451
High Scores 0
Karma:
bubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond repute
bubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond reputebubbaganoush has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 3,242, Level: 5
Points: 3,242, Level: 5 Points: 3,242, Level: 5 Points: 3,242, Level: 5
Level up: 6%, 358 Points needed
Level up: 6% Level up: 6% Level up: 6%
Activity: 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
Default
permalink
In the post salary cap era it isn't exactly apples to apples. Who has the most talent players isn't rally a fair way to asses the teams. . It's who has the best team under the cap. There isn't an easy way to assemble a team with that talent level anymore.
bubbaganoush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29th, 2008, 09:23 PM   #20
Down with O.P.P
 
emfn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 202
Thanks: 15
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Karma:
emfn has a reputation beyond repute
emfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond reputeemfn has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 1,171, Level: 2
Points: 1,171, Level: 2 Points: 1,171, Level: 2 Points: 1,171, Level: 2
Level up: 3%, 229 Points needed
Level up: 3% Level up: 3% Level up: 3%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
View My Facebook Profile
Default
permalink
Quote:
Originally Posted by FabulousForum View Post
the LA Xtreme!


XTREME!!!!
emfn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 29th, 2008, 11:40 PM   #21
2nd Scoring Line
 
Brown23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 512
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Karma:
Brown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond reputeBrown23 has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 3,388, Level: 5
Points: 3,388, Level: 5 Points: 3,388, Level: 5 Points: 3,388, Level: 5
Level up: 6%, 212 Points needed
Level up: 6% Level up: 6% Level up: 6%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
Default
permalink
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangePuck View Post
They didn't win the cup? Damn....for the past 15 years I thought that they had won the cup!
I don't get what your exactly trying to get at. But if it's about how I said "I know the Kings may of not won the Stanley Cup that year" meaning back in 93' to point out.
Brown23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Contact Us - Los Angeles Kings Hockey - LetsGoKings.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.

©1997-2008 LetsGoKings.com - All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.30653 seconds with 26 queries

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180