Want less ads?
Join Team LGK
for only $5


Official LA Kings Shop

LA Kings Hats icon
Men's Apparel icon
Women's Apparel icon
Kid's Wear icon
Collectibles and Memorabilia icon
Home / Office icon
Toys and Games icon
DVD's and CD's icon
Kings Gifts icon
Kings Auctions
Hockey Books
Entertainment Books

iPod Connection
LGK T-Shirts

NHL Personal Checks


Tag Cloud
2008 acquire avery back big birthday blake blues call cammalleri camp coach coyotes crawford cup day deal dean derby dolls doughty draft ducks final flames free game go kings happy head hockey inside interview jersey july kings lgk lombardi lubo make mccain news nhl obama penguins pick picks play prospects question rob round season sharks sign signs stamkos stanley team teubert thread times today top trade video visnovsky wings year years
Rinkrat's iPod  



Go Back   Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum > LetsGoKings.com > LA Kings Talk
Register GalleryBlogs FAQ Calendar Arcade Wagering

Notices


Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!

About This Page: This is a discussion on LA Kings Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum.
Originally Posted by Crockett77 Assuming the Kings don't get the #1 overall. If they do it's Stamkos, end of story. If they don't. Though the Kings may be in position

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 4th, 2008, 01:42 PM   #55
Roadrunner Great/WHA MVP
 
KINGS17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,330
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member
Karma:
KINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond repute
KINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond reputeKINGS17 has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 6,859, Level: 19
Points: 6,859, Level: 19 Points: 6,859, Level: 19 Points: 6,859, Level: 19
Level up: 73%, 191 Points needed
Level up: 73% Level up: 73% Level up: 73%
Activity: 63%
Activity: 63% Activity: 63% Activity: 63%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crockett77 View Post
Assuming the Kings don't get the #1 overall. If they do it's Stamkos, end of story.

If they don't.
Though the Kings may be in position to pick Doughty. I gotta believe with the looks of who is already under contract, in the system and property of the Kings.

Lubo for 5 more seasons, Johnson, Hickey and Harold I gotta believe that Lombardi's gotta feel he's got enough "Offensive" defensemen and will be looking for toughness.

Lombardi may trade down if possible to get something additional.

I believe whoever it is after Stamkos on the Kings draft board. They are putting defense/toughness/size and NHL readiness ahead of potential offensive upside of defensemen.
You ALWAYS draft the best player available, then make trades to fill holes and eliminate duplication of style among players.
KINGS17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2008, 02:31 PM   #56
Team LGK
 
symbology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 381
Thanks: 35
Thanked 46 Times in 11 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member
Karma:
symbology has a reputation beyond repute
symbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Level up: 33%, 271 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 19%
Activity: 19% Activity: 19% Activity: 19%
Default

Quote:
It's wide open. It's very real to think one of the other centers could be taken.
What "centers" do you see being taken at #3? There is only one other center that can be and probably will be taken in the top 5. Surely, you don't see Beach going in the top 5 after the way he finished the season. Maybe you are thinking about Filatov? He is not a center, though could easily go top 5.

Last edited by symbology; April 4th, 2008 at 02:38 PM.
symbology is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2008, 02:36 PM   #57
Team LGK
 
symbology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 381
Thanks: 35
Thanked 46 Times in 11 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member
Karma:
symbology has a reputation beyond repute
symbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Level up: 33%, 271 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 19%
Activity: 19% Activity: 19% Activity: 19%
Default

Quote:
How is it weak?

It isnt saying that Schenn is a bad hockey player. Or even that he shouldnt be the third or perhaps even the second defenseman taken.

it's saying that Doughty is THAT ****ING GOOD.

whats wrong with that?
I would not really compare Schenn to Doughty, but it is fair to compare Pietrangelo and Bogosian to Doughty. How do you compare them?
symbology is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2008, 02:42 PM   #58
Team LGK
 
symbology's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 381
Thanks: 35
Thanked 46 Times in 11 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member
Karma:
symbology has a reputation beyond repute
symbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond reputesymbology has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10 Points: 1,979, Level: 10
Level up: 33%, 271 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 19%
Activity: 19% Activity: 19% Activity: 19%
Default

Quote:
You ALWAYS draft the best player available, then make trades to fill holes and eliminate duplication of style among players.
Agreed.... to a point. If players are pretty close though, I feel that the draft for need, or players fit with the team can make a difference. Again, if players are pretty close.
symbology is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:52 AM.


vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.

©1997-2008 LetsGoKings.com - All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.35926 seconds with 29 queries