You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on LA Kings Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. From Eklund's Comments section...everyone seems to have a source:
---------------------------------------
Jeff Carter is what LA wants, Visnovksy is what Philly wants.. so what i am thinking is that if
From Eklund's Comments section...everyone seems to have a source:
---------------------------------------
Jeff Carter is what LA wants, Visnovksy is what Philly wants.. so what i am thinking is that if Philly is losing Carter, than they wants someone who can fill his role, which would be Cammerelli..
Visnovsky for Carter .. is this a fair deal??
than it would be Camerelli for prospects/picks
im trying to collects some details so i can get a better view on the talks
i think they are trying to work out Upshall, Tolpeko and a 1st for Visnovsky, but LA wont budge, unless Carter is included.. and if Carter is include than Philly wants Cammerelli to be included.. HAHA i lovee trade talks
If you're listening to Ecklund, you may as well pull out your Magic 8 ball. He's a complete joke. I can count on one finger the amout of times he's been right. Guess which finger.
If you're listening to Ecklund, you may as well pull out your Magic 8 ball. He's a complete joke. I can count on one finger the amout of times he's been right. Guess which finger.
Luckily and gratefully this was not Eklund but simply a Flyers fan with a "source". The beauty of rumors is that they rarely if ever happen. I just love all the hypothesizing...it's like bad reality television...rarely does it mirror reality.
Eklund lost even the little credibility he had this morning when he reported on a trade rumor from PJ Stock on Hossa that Eklund said "huge huge HUGE legs to it." Later PJ Stock reported that he made up the rumor!
From Eklund's Comments section...everyone seems to have a source:
---------------------------------------
Jeff Carter is what LA wants, Visnovksy is what Philly wants.. so what i am thinking is that if Philly is losing Carter, than they wants someone who can fill his role, which would be Cammerelli..
Visnovsky for Carter .. is this a fair deal??
than it would be Camerelli for prospects/picks
im trying to collects some details so i can get a better view on the talks
i think they are trying to work out Upshall, Tolpeko and a 1st for Visnovsky, but LA wont budge, unless Carter is included.. and if Carter is include than Philly wants Cammerelli to be included.. HAHA i lovee trade talks
Actually with the amount of injured talent on defense that Detroit has and the type of player they like. Visnovsky would make a much better fit in Detroit than Philly. But, with Lindstrom, Rafalski and Kronwall making a combined 16.45 the next 2 seasons. It would be difficult to fit in Vis at 5.65.
Philly wants their defensemen to be physical in front of the net, Vis isn't that physical.
Everyone is Talking Trade 
Drunken
