You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on LA Kings Talk within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. That's not near enough for Lecavalier.
The Kings should be spending to cap maximum every year. As of right now the Kings' player contract outlook looks awesome. A lot of
The Kings should be spending to cap maximum every year. As of right now the Kings' player contract outlook looks awesome. A lot of good young players, a market prone to long term contracts etc. I mean Lombardi probably saved himself 2 million a year from a restricted offer by getting Brown signed for the next six seasons. The Kings outlook financially is really bright and by adding Richards you could cap out your forwards at 7.8. He would be older than our current young players with a ring and a captaincy to his credit. I would think that he would reasonably demand a higher wage than any other forward now or in the next three or four years.
And plus Brad Richards is awesome. Playoff MVP, Lady Byng. Two way player. Put him with Frolov and you've got an awesome first line combination. Frolov-Richards-Purcell, isn't Richards a Newfie like Purcell? If Purcell's not ready re-sign Nagy. Frolov-Richards-Nagy. Frolov would score 40 with only 2.9 against the cap, Nagy would be relatively cheap, Purcell's locked up at 1.4 for 3 more years.
Last edited by 236nOT; January 18th, 2008 at 11:43 PM.
Birdman
