Trusting any one polling organization is a mistake. Not trusting polls at all to help you understand voting trends and patterns is also a mistake. This election cycle has seen a couple of wild swings of opinion 'measured' by a single polling organization that should warrant skepticism about any one 'snapshot' poll. The Newsweek polls from a few weeks ago and the most recent Gallup polls are glaring examples.
But a couple of things are clear about how to use poll results reasonably.
National polls are most useful if averaged with each other.
Local...state level...polling on the presidential election is far more informative that national polling results since, as we all know, you win by winning states and not by winning the popular vote nationally.
AND
News organizations tend to report polling results differently one to the next because they have contracts with different polling organizations.
They also tend to report polls that fit their political POV if they have a clear POV. But if their POV is simply "Let's make this race look very close no matter what so that we keep people watching and reading," then that may lead to the most misleading reporting of poll results of all.
Here's an interesting blog article discussing how CNN may be intentionally misreporting poll results in order to exploit the 'horse race' aspects of the campaign. Basically it reveals how the much viewed CNN national election map is plain unreliable.
The blog posted below is followed by a national map that is much more accurate in relation to the best polling results presently available.
Why report news when creating it is so much more fulfilling? TheZoo Electoral-vote.com: President, Senate, House Updated Daily
__________________

"For if once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." Thomas DeQuincey, 1700's