You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go to Page...
Thank you for crosschecking our sponsors!
About This Page: This is a discussion on Politics within the LetsGoKings.com forums, at Los Angeles Kings Hockey Fan Forum. Originally Posted by dgrycan
Nah . . . with more guns in homes, B&Es just became a much more profittable venture. They don't need jobs now.
Oh wait . .
I'm not sure where we draw the line on these gun-control issues. What about the law that says you cannot have a gun at the bar? Why is that law okay? Why is there even such a thing as a *concealed weapon* permit?
It's a cluster **** because you cannot have anything be considered illegal unless a government says so. Then if it does, according to the recent precedent, throw that law out because of the 2nd amendment.
You cannot argue *logically* about gun control because the paradox already exists. So what are the limits of gun control, and why is a city banning a certain type of gun okay? What seperates a tank cannon from a hand gun, and where is that in the constitution?
If our government was becoming overly oppressive, I'd rather have the tank cannon.
-_Sf
Last edited by seraphim; June 27th, 2008 at 04:58 PM.
