View Single Post
Old July 14th, 2008, 05:26 AM   #13
FlyinKIng
Helps coming, Wiki Wiki
 
FlyinKIng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,600
Thanks: 67
Thanked 47 Times in 25 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member

Karma: 7922578
FlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond repute
FlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond reputeFlyinKIng has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmpaquet View Post
It wasn't a passenger jet - it was a PC-12 (a single engine turboprop). I'm not sure that the F-16 pilot was actually reprimanded - the investigation seemed to indicate he didn't do anything wrong; in fact, he never approached closer than 600ft according to the HUD tapes, and did so on a parallel course. The PC-12 pilot was flying through an MOA and should have expected this. At a minimum, he should have called ahead to figure out if it was hot at the time.

F-16/Pilatus Incident: Air Force Says No Closer Than 600 Feet
The last time I was at a charter company a Pilatus IS used for charting a group of 10-12 people. Is no commercial jumbo, but it is a passenger turboprop. And yes the military pilot was reprimanded according to AOPA. Either way there was 2 problems like you guys pointed out, the pilot should have checked to see if the MOA was hot, and the F-16 pilot shouldn't have gotten bored.
FlyinKIng is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.26474 seconds with 21 queries