View Single Post
Old June 6th, 2008, 04:42 PM   #33
OddManRush
1st Scoring Line
 
OddManRush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Karma: 3390796
OddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond repute
OddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond reputeOddManRush has a reputation beyond repute
Default

McCain reverses his stance on warrantless wiretapping and telecom immunity. Six months ago, he's against them, now he's for them. But he says he's been for them all along.

6 months ago:
Quote:
Mr. McCain was asked whether he believed that the president had constitutional power to conduct surveillance on American soil for national security purposes without a warrant, regardless of federal statutes.

He replied: “There are some areas where the statutes don’t apply, such as in the surveillance of overseas communications. Where they do apply, however, I think that presidents have the obligation to obey and enforce laws that are passed by Congress and signed into law by the president, no matter what the situation is.”

Following up, the interviewer asked whether Mr. McCain was saying a statute trumped a president’s powers as commander in chief when it came to a surveillance law. “I don’t think the president has the right to disobey any law,” Mr. McCain replied.
Now:
Quote:
In a letter posted online by National Review this week, the adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, said Mr. McCain believed that the Constitution gave Mr. Bush the power to authorize the National Security Agency to monitor Americans’ international phone calls and e-mail without warrants, despite a 1978 federal statute that required court oversight of surveillance.

Mr. McCain believes that “neither the administration nor the telecoms need apologize for actions that most people, except for the A.C.L.U. and trial lawyers, understand were constitutional and appropriate in the wake of the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001,” Mr. Holtz-Eakin wrote.

And if Mr. McCain is elected president, Mr. Holtz-Eakin added, he would do everything he could to prevent terrorist attacks, “including asking the telecoms for appropriate assistance to collect intelligence against foreign threats to the United States as authorized by Article II of the Constitution.”
Claiming his stance hasn't changed:
Quote:
Tucker Bounds, a McCain campaign spokesman, said Mr. McCain’s position on surveillance laws and executive power “has not changed.”

“John McCain has been an unequivocal advocate of pursuing the radicals and extremists who seek to attack Americans,” Mr. Bounds wrote in an e-mail message, adding that Mr. McCain’s “votes and positions have been completely consistent and any suggestion otherwise is a distortion of his clear record.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/us...in&oref=slogin

NYT front page reports on McCain's reversal on spying, executive power - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
__________________
"If I could lead you into the Promised Land, I would not do it, because someone else would come along and lead you out."
OddManRush is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.33773 seconds with 22 queries