Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal P.I.T.A.  That's good. Maybe the NHL would be better off without you as a fan, since you're more concerned with personalities than the game. Maybe they don't need any more fans to cheer for a loss so their team can get a better pick. Maybe, since it's a physical sport, they don't need so many soft and sensitive fans. Oh but wait, ten weeks on a fractured leg!? Do you enjoy sucking yourself off? |
Hmmm . . . who do I think is a better representative for the game of hockey - Martin Brodeur or Sean Avery? I'll get back to you on that one, it's going to take a while.
What has cheering for a loss to do with Sean Avery? The Rangers lost three games with him in the line-up against the Pens, and now they won without him! My god! He wasn't the glue that held the team together after all!
Trust me - if I could enjoy sucking myself off, I would. But I'm too damned tall.
My point (something that Avery fans always have a tough time grasping) was that you were quickly able to predict that Avery played the entire game on what he knew was a spleen injury like he was some kind of guy superhero.
I was going to end with a religious slander, or perhaps making fun of some diseased member of your family, but I won't go all "Avery" on you. No worries. If you ever do end up going through a rotten divorice, I will make sure to rub it in your face for at least five years afterwards, though.