View Single Post
Old March 24th, 2008, 10:15 PM   #14
Blurker
I am ignoring you.
 
Blurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,502
Blurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond repute
Blurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond reputeBlurker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ianmonsta View Post
personally i like not having to dig through a 100 page thread just to find some of the info found in this thread.

just saying.
I second that. Thus my starting of the thread.



Here's my first attempt at HDR. As a reference, the first image is the middle exposure in the bracket. (-2, 0, +2 if my memory serves.)




This is the culmination of my HDR attempt using Photoshop CS2 only, Merge to HDR, and some tweaking until it didn't look crappy.



I'm not stoked about the loss of definition in the two mountain ranges in the BG, nor the ultra-black foreground foliage. There's also a bit of movement in one or all of the exposures as I don't have the IR remote or a cable release.

Either way, I'm curious to see if you guys think the HDR shot is too processed, not processed enough, or what.

Last edited by Blurker; March 24th, 2008 at 10:28 PM.
Blurker is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.21567 seconds with 13 queries