Thread: Do stats lie?
View Single Post
Old February 2nd, 2008, 05:28 AM   #1
boro_slo
2nd Scoring Line
 
boro_slo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 394
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Karma:
boro_slo has a reputation beyond reputeboro_slo has a reputation beyond reputeboro_slo has a reputation beyond repute
boro_slo has a reputation beyond reputeboro_slo has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 1,496, Level: 8
Points: 1,496, Level: 8 Points: 1,496, Level: 8 Points: 1,496, Level: 8
Level up: 82%, 54 Points needed
Level up: 82% Level up: 82% Level up: 82%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Default Do stats lie? AKA Our D is bad, how to solve that?

U are probably asking yourself why is he starting yet another crapy stats thread...

Well im not fealing well and i just browsed some stats pages...

Let me start with ...we are not all that bad acording some stats and minor quirks could turn this team into a winner. (did I say that im not fealing well?)

First of all Ill compare with joung Pitsburg team. Brown is 3 goals behind Malkin, while both Crosby and Kopi have 20. (PIT 51 games, Kings 53 games) Thats not a big deficit, but those PIT guys both have around 40 asists, wich got me thinking someone needs to score those excess goals... Wich made me think we need some second line scoring. (Frolov did step up lately and i hope Moulson keeps the pace)

Labs has 91.3 save % (Brodeur has 91.7%...) he is prety good actualy. And that means we should get our shots-against down. And we came to D.

bad penalty-kill .... D

And It doesnt mean just D-men, the whole D-sistem (with coaching and all that), we do have the most assistant coaches in the ligue, dont we? What they do teorize?

I know that is nothing new to all u hockey-savy ppl, i just vanted to start up some debate with trade-deadline nearing and that.

Do u people think tradeing Blake and other D-men is best solution we have and what we want to get in return?...It probably wont be D-men.

Last edited by boro_slo; February 4th, 2008 at 03:16 AM. Reason: Spelling.
boro_slo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to boro_slo For This Useful Post:
CarlaMuller (February 3rd, 2008), JMDx10 (February 3rd, 2008), MuPPeT666 (February 4th, 2008), TooCool (February 2nd, 2008)
 
Page generated in 0.24009 seconds with 21 queries