View Single Post
Old January 26th, 2008, 01:05 PM   #2
PPharoah
Team LGK
 
PPharoah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,246
Thanks: 67
Thanked 58 Times in 12 Posts
Crosschecks: 0
High Scores 0
Contributing Member
Karma:
PPharoah has a reputation beyond repute
PPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond reputePPharoah has a reputation beyond repute


Awards Showcase
Points: 6,619, Level: 9
Points: 6,619, Level: 9 Points: 6,619, Level: 9 Points: 6,619, Level: 9
Level up: 10%, 981 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 12%
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
Default Yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by K 4 L View Post
I wouldn't post that unless I noticed some extra intensity in the games he has dropped the gloves in, "PROPS" to Raitis could be the right word in this case I guess, Im guessing that fight total might be between 10-15 if he was healthy all year, he missed a lot of games, then played in many he wasnt able to fight in.

http://www.hockeyfights.com/players/...htcard/reg2008

Half of them road games too, although the last one at home was a dandy.

Kings are 5-1 when Raitis fights.
Kings are 15-30 (simplified) when Raitis hasn't fought.

Maybe it has just happened that way, or maybe it has some real impact on this team... I wouldnt be one to say for sure, but either way it is a glaring stat.
And I wonder what our record was when he had to wear that face shield and couldn't fight. Then when he got the face shield off and could fight again, aren't we 5 of 7?
His fights are usually the catalyst to the Kings scoring some unanswered goals as well.

PPharoah is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.23493 seconds with 20 queries